Zera's Blog

A Citizen's View from Main Street

MN HF264 – The Cheeseburger Bill


H.F. No. 264, as introduced – 87th Legislative Session (2011-2012) Posted on Jan 31, 2011

1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to civil actions; prohibiting actions against certain persons for weight

1.3
gain as a result of consuming certain foods;proposing coding for new law in

1.4
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 604.

1.5
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

1.6
Section 1. [604.191] PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN FOOD CONSUMPTION

1.7
ACT.
1.8 Subdivision 1. Title. This act may be cited as the Personal Responsibility in Food

1.9
Consumption Act.

1.10
Subd. 2. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section the following terms have

1.11
the meanings given.

1.12
(b) “Long-term consumption” means the cumulative effect of the consumption of

1.13
food or nonalcoholic beverages, and not the effect of a single instance of consumption.

1.14
(c) “Party” means an individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership,

1.15
society, joint stock company, or any other entity, including any governmental entity.

1.16
Subd. 3. Immunity from civil liability. A producer, grower, manufacturer, packer,

1.17
distributor, carrier, holder, marketer, or seller of a food or nonalcoholic beverage intended

1.18
for human consumption, or an association of one or more of such entities, must not be

1.19
subject to civil liability based on any individual’s or group of individuals’ purchase or

1.20
consumption of food or nonalcoholic beverages in cases where liability arises from weight

1.21
gain, obesity, or a health condition associated with weight gain or obesity and resulting

1.22
from the individual’s or group of individuals’ long-term purchase or consumption of a

1.23
food or nonalcoholic beverage.

2.1 Subd. 4. Actions permitted. Subdivision 3 does not apply to a claim of weight
2.2
gain or obesity that is based on:

2.3
(1) a material violation of an adulteration or misbranding requirement prescribed

2.4
by state or federal statute, rule, or regulation and the claimed injury was proximately

2.5
caused by the violation; or

2.6
(2) any other material violation of federal or state law applicable to the

2.7
manufacturing, marketing, distribution, advertising, labeling, or sale of food, if the

2.8
violation is knowing and willful, and the claimed injury was proximately caused by the

2.9
violation.
2.10 Sec. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2.11
Section 1 is effective the day following final enactment and applies to any action

2.12
brought by any party on or after the effective date.

Countered by opposing lawmakers in that:

  1. no such lawsuit has ever been filed in the state, and
  2. it’s the judge’s job to rule on the validity of legal claims,

(Dean) Urdahl (R-Grove City) has called his message preventative, pointing out that even if the prosecution did not win, a lot of expenses would be incurred.

“even if the prosecution did not win”. Under this law, we would never know. Under this law, some could be denied justice. I would expect the statute of limitations to severely limit the liability of “long-term consumption”, but that’s just the common sense talking.

There are times when the protection of businesses from the consequences of their actions is needful to protect the greater good.

The polio vaccine is one case in point. Continue reading

Advertisements

March 2, 2011 Posted by | Legislation, Strangelove | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michele Bachmann Raises Record $5.4 Million In Three Months


Her support has nothing to do with her qualifications as a Representative and everything to do with her notoriety. She is a standard-bearer and symbol for the far right, a leader of their extremism and embodiment of their ineffectiveness and irresponsibility in matters of true governance.

She believes that we should be a theocracy, and her success is a testament to the incompatibility of theocracy and democracy. Christian fundamentalist money loves her.

She wants to dismantle government of the people in favor of corporate domination, no matter how irresponsible and destructive that is. Corporate money loves her.

Her district has the highest foreclosure and unemployment rates in the state. Little of her money comes from actual constituents.

She has formed a Tea Party Caucus in the House, and effectively dared republicans to join or else. She is accumulating power without any real accomplishment behind it. She says and does anything for political gain. She is the embodiment of what is wrong with American politics.

Those who vote for her fall into three categories:
1) Those who share her extreme ideology. They will vote for her no matter what.
2) Hardline republicans who vote the party no matter the candidate. Long-time republicans are starting to defect in her case as she becomes too extreme for them to accept anymore.
3) Those who don’t pay attention to politics and just vote the party or the name they remember or the ad they believe. A few facts make all the difference for them.

Michele Bachmann is antithetical to our survival as a country. She is pro-religious persecution and pro-corporatocracy, and anti-everything else.

  • Anti-worker
  • Anti-consumer
  • Anti-environment
  • Anti-freedom of religion other than hers.
  • Anti-civil rights that offend her personal prejudices.

Her economic policies have never worked, even for her, yet she clings to them like stone tablets.

She is exactly the sort of politician that we need to get out of government.

More on 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

October 15, 2010 Posted by | Campaign Finance, Candidates, Capitalism, Constitution, Direction, Elections, Government, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: